Generated drafts read confidently at any level of accuracy. The pricing is plausible, the stat is close, the claim is almost what legal approved. Nobody catches it until a customer does.
Pricing moves, positioning evolves, the product ships. Nobody schedules a context audit, so the documents feeding your content quietly fall behind the business they describe.

These are the same problem. Nothing compares what you say with what you know. Content Grounding is that comparison, run in 1 pass over any document.
Every factual claim in the document lands in 1 of 3 buckets. Select a bucket to see what you get.
Every supported claim shows the context item backing it. Open the source in place to read the passage it rests on, without leaving the report.
As you write, you naturally touch the facts your library already covers. When the draft and the library disagree, you know which one is stale. The system never assumes the library is right, and it never guesses for you.
1 card, 2 actions: update the document to match the library, or update the library because the document is the current truth. No quarterly review, no re-reading everything. The work you are already doing surfaces exactly the context that needs attention.
Between drafts, Context Intelligence is the always-on side of the same discipline, watching the library while you are not writing.
The launch post announces the new count, so the library is likely the stale side here.
Every action in the report is a single commit. Nothing routes through a form or a follow-up task.
Just wrote the definitive piece on your new positioning? Add the entire document to your Reference Library as a new item, straight from the report.
When the document is the current truth, update every context item it touches at once instead of resolving claims 1 at a time.
Pick the destination context item for any individual claim and commit it there. The proposed home is a suggestion, never a decision made for you.
Settle any conflict toward the document or toward the library. Both are 1 click, and both leave a citation behind.
Library edits are precise. An accepted fix appends the claim to the item you chose. The rest of the item is never rewritten.
A grounding report is only useful if you can trust every line of it. 4 rules keep it honest.
A claim must be directly stated in the text. Nothing is read between the lines, so nothing gets checked that you did not actually say.
A quote from an analyst stays an analyst's statement. It never quietly becomes your claim, in the document or in the library.
Numeric facts are only marked supported by company-authoritative sources. Reference material can inform a draft, but it never becomes the authority on your numbers.
Each supported claim links to its exact source, and the source opens in place. No trust-me checkmarks.
The last pass on a launch post or pricing page before it goes live.
6 assets in a campaign, all stating the same numbers, verified against the same source.
Fluent drafts get a verification pass before anyone spends editing time on them.
Every scan surfaces gaps, so the library grows out of documents you were writing anyway.
Agencies and freelancers submit work that is checked against your truth, not their memory of it.
After a positioning or pricing change, re-scan the pages that never come off your site.
Content Grounding is a Command plan capability. Scans run on demand and use Studio Credits, scaled to the size of the scan: a short post costs little, a 40-page guide costs more. Reading your context is always free.
Context you can vouch for.
Marcora keeps your context assembled at generation time, verified against what you publish, and current between drafts.
Content is verified against the library, and the library stays current through what you write.
Run 1 scan on a real draft and watch your library catch up with your business.
A statement of fact written directly in the text: a number, a date, a capability, a named commitment. Opinions, tone, and anything merely implied are left alone. If the document does not state it, the scan does not check it.
Nothing, until you decide. The report shows the document's claim and the library's claim side by side, and you resolve it in either direction: update the document to match the library, or update the library because the document is the current truth.
No. An accepted fix appends the claim to the context item you chose. The rest of the item is untouched, so nothing you wrote gets paraphrased behind your back.
Command. Scans run on demand and use Studio Credits, scaled to the size of the scan. Reading your context never costs credits.
Most scans finish in under 1 minute. Long documents take a few, and the report opens as soon as the pass completes.